Top 7 things that are very bad in Windows 10 – [En]

Many wonder if Windows 10 is really worth it. Let’s talk about a few bad things in it.

        1. Reports everything (spies you)

The number one bad thing on the list is of course the ‘spy everything’ policy.
This is talked about all over the internet tech communities and has been proved hands down as real so there is no need to go into details.
If you want to counter it, you have a lot of work to do. You will have to adjust most if not all of the following: Telemetry, Biometrics, Handwriting Data Disclosure, Handwriting Error Reporting, Application Telemetry, Inventory Collector, Steps Recorder, Lock Screen Camera Settings, Cortana (you can’t terminate this too easy), Localization, Sensors, Web Search, Windows Media DRM Internet Access, App Notifications, Password Button Ads, Advertising ID, SmartScreen Filter for URLs, Write information, Access to Language List, Acquaintance, Prompts Feedback, Windows Update Distribution, Windows Update for Other Products, WiFi Sense, Windows Defender, Automatic Windows Updates, OneDrive, Automatic Driver Updates.
And then App Access to Localization, Camera, Microphone, User Accounts Info, Calendar, Messages, Wireless Connections, Uncoupled Devices.
If you don’t tweak/disable most of the above, you will be spied and spammed. The only way for Windows 10 to be safe is to have it never go online, which defeats the purpose if its design.

        2. There is no off choice
You have no choice when it comes to what Windows 10 does. Even if you tweaked most of the above, you most likely did it for nothing.
I’ve made a simple test: installed W10, disabled all options that you have a GUI off button for, then just updated the fresh install.
After the update, 1/3 of the turned off settings were back on. So practically, any update can do what it wants to your settings. They are not yours to control anymore.
Also, the default browser seems to re-become Edge every time certain updates are applied. Again, your choice is irrelevant. Edge wants to be the default browsers and it sets itself like that at any time it feels so.
Another related to this absurd thing is that the update system suddenly decides you need to restart the computer. Or even worse, you need to shutdown a notebook to leave somewhere and there’s no such option: you have shutdown and update instead, which can take quite a lot. This system is absolutely retard no matter how you look at it.

        3. The drivers problem
Related a lot to the above is the driver system. Many drivers get updated in a bad manner, with a bad version. This, of course, can cause anything from small glitches to BSODs.
A driver that causes Windows 10 not to start anymore can and will likely be installed at a point and there’s nothing a normal user without tech knowledge can do about it.
Removing a newer driver in favor of an older one is a badly designed process. You just can’t do that directly. You will need to uninstall the current driver, then use a basic one (like in the case of video cards), then install the version you want. Of course, that requires auto update for drivers not to be enabled, an issue that is difficult to actually accomplish (explained above why).

        4. The play-dead ‘skill’
If you manage to turn off enough not to get over-spied, W10 will start playing dead. It will say it’s hurt even if everything is fine. There are many situations when this is encountered and things can go very far.
As a far-end example, after actually disabling the auto-update on a W10 home, after a while USB sticks suddenly stopped being detected with no reason whatsoever. Same sticks, clean, one day they all work, next day they don’t anymore.
No amount of official chipset or USB, USB Root Hub or any kind of related drivers made them work again. But, enabling auto-update and clicking ‘search for updated driver’ on the unrecognized USB devices quickly fixed the issue. So all of the official intel drivers were bad, but Windows Update magically made it work with an ancient driver taken from who knows where ? I find that suspicious at least.

        5. Not recoverable
If previous windows versions were easier to debug, in the case of W10 you don’t even have start-up control. You know … the old F8 menu. You can’t even start in VGA mode in case of trouble.
If you boot your system from a disk to try a recovery, the options there almost certainly do not work. I tried all of them in several systems on several scenarios.
No recovery option worked in any of the cases. Each time, a complete reinstall was necessary.
That was for unencrypted, non-EFI-enabled systems. If you add those to the picture, you practically have a near null change to make an actual successful system recovery. Best thing you can actually do is to spawn a command prompt and try your own fixes when possible.

        6. Bad partitioning
No matter what you do, you can’t make Windows 10 install on a single partition. It always spawns junk partitions. On windows 7, if you had a correctly set available partition, no other trashing of your hard drive was done. Not in Windows 10. It takes at least one chunk of your drive anyway.
For anyone that cares about the content of it’s drive, this is just bad practice. As a general recommendation: never install W10 on the same physical drive where you keep your data. W10 increases a lot the risk of you loosing everything on a drive, even if you have multiple partitions. From my perspective, partitions are obsolete anyway.

        7. Kills classic hard drives
I’m working in IT industry and help friends whenever in need when it comes to IT&C. Relatively recently, a weird thing happened: I had an unusual high number of incoming notebooks with ‘not working anymore’ label.
In all cases, no exception whatsoever in about the last year, they had only one issue: hard-drive with bad sectors in the exact location where Windows 10 resides. The only thing in common for those notebooks was that they had Windows 10 on them.
In most of the cases, it was an upgrade from Windows 7. As you tech guys should know, the amount of files in Windows has always increased exponentially.
A random test count: Fresh Windows XP SP3: 9k files, 300 dirs ; 3-months Windows 7 SP1: 72k files, 13k dirs; Years-old Windows 7 (since SP1 release date): 91k files, 22k dirs ; Fresh Install and Updated Windows 10 112k files, 23k dirs.
This could explain the excessive wear of older HDD. But it does not explain why a new HDD also gets damaged. I had 4 cases when in a very short time new HDDs (4 different models from different manufacturers) were damaged in the exact same W10 area. For one of them, I checked the uptime using the S.M.A.R.T. attributes. It was a little over 600h (that’s 25 days of uptime). That’s really low for a new HDD, don’t you think ?
Considering what I have seen, I’d never let W10 install on a notebook HDD. I’m curious to make a test with SAS server drives, to see what happens. I’ll update this if I manage to do some long term testing. But it’s clear that W10 was designed to be used with SSDs.

There are other inconveniences when using W10, but those are the ones that I find by far to be the worst.

        Do you remember what happened when that failed experiment called Vista arrived ? No-one wanted it. So they enforced it by using 2 tactics: no new Direct X for XP (which practically obliged all gamers and many other graphic-related categories to switch to it) and the OEM deals, where the OEMs were obliged to delivered notebooks with Vista and remove the XP drivers from the availability list on their websites.
After the fix called Windows 7 (actually v6.1), other experiments like 8 and 8.1 failed, so they needed to change tactics. They tweaked some more and made 10, which was free to be upgraded to by anyone with a compatible system and older OS. That still works today even if the offer is officially over.
But since nothing is for free, the data they gather with 10 is millions of times more valuable compared to the actual price of the OS. Are you willing to make the deal ? Does having W10 actually help you with something ? Consider that before upgrading.

Posted in Research and Dismemberment | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ziua incompetenţei

        Vă întrebaţi ce-i asta ? Păi exact ce se înţelege. O zi a incompetenţei, care trebuie sărbătorită în fiecare an. E bun aşa ceva ? Sigur, ar trebui să fie evident. Avem incompetenţi peste tot: de la vînzători la politicieni. E un mare concurs de incompetenţă la noi în ţară…cu multipli cîştigători…de fapt…cu majoritate cîştigătoare.
Toata lumea vrea sa fie cît mai incompetentă. Dacă totuşi vînzătorul poate mai are o scuză pentru incompetenţă, că poate n-are nici şcoală, nici pregătire, un specialist într-un domeniu de activitate nu are. Ăla nu se mai poate scuza. El e pregătit în domeniul respectiv. Totuşi, 9 din 10 în orice domeniu sînt în momentul ăsta total incompetenţi chiar în acel domeniu. Am constatat asta în absolut toate domeniile de activitate cu care am avut de-aface. Cîteva zeci.

La politician e şi mai grav. Politicianul excelează în incompetenţă. Nici nu are cum să fie competent pentru că, spre exemplu, un ministru e pus să conducă un minister într-un domeniu de activitate unde nu ştie absolut nimic. El e pus acolo că s-a dus cu saru-mîna unde trebuie, nu că ar avea o minimă legătură cu domeniul respectiv. Dar oficial nu-i problemă: îşi fabrică un doctorat şi gata, e competent pe hîrtie.

        Luînd asta în considerare, ziua incompetenţei ar trebui evident să aibă o semnificaţie politică. Pai haideţi să ne gîndim: cînd s-a născut în ţară la noi incompetenţa pe toate planurile ?
E simplu: imediat după 1989. Ca atare, Ziua Incompetenţei o declar a fi oficial data de 20 mai. La 20 mai 1990 au fost alegerile ‘democratice’.
S-a ales cu succes incompetenţa iar apoi s-a reales de fiecare dată, fără excepţie. Alegerile între incompetenţii de mai multe nuanţe continuă şi azi. Iluzia e menţinută (şi cu gaz pe foc dacă trebuie), incompetenţa şi trădarea continuă în acelaşi ritm.

        Aşadar, pe data de 20 mai, uraţi şi voi tuturor incompetenţilor pe care ii ştiţi un călduros ‘La mulţi ani !’. Nu contează ce-s: colegi, şefi, meşteri, primari, etc. Felicitaţi-i pentru incompetenţa lor ! Spuneţi-le ca anul viitor ii premiaţi. O bomboană, un cap în gură, orice – premiu să fie !

        Daca tot avem acum ziua asta, trebuie să avem în fiecare an şi un incompetent premiant, un locul întîi.
Premuil întîi pentru 2017 an se acordă în unanimitate şi cu un avans zdrobitor în faţa oricărui alt concurent domnului Preşedinte Klaus Iohannis. Acesta a fost aşa de incompetent încît nici macar să respecte constituţia ţării nu a fost în stare. Altceva nici nu mai merită menţionat comparativ cu asta !

Posted in Neutral Zone | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

De la adevarul istoric la deceptia prezentului

            Poate unii dintre voi s-au prins că în zilele noastre sîntem înconjuraţi numai de falsităţi. S-a falsificat ştiinţa, religia, medicina … chiar şi mîncarea (asta dacă nu ştiaţi că s-ar putea să mîncaţi cam des plastic frumos colorat), dar în articolul curent vom discuta mai mult de falsificarea istoriei.

            E foarte trist că azi se inventează o altă realitate, se rupe legătura cu sinele şi se trăieşte într-o mare iluzie. Istoria n-o mai fac istoricii, ci alţii la ordin politic. E mare problemă că ni se inventează un trecut corupt doar ca să poată profita alţii de ţara noastră. Cretinismul şi imbecilismul celor care nu-s în stare de nimic dar pun botul la toate vrăjelile şi mai şi dau legi să le suporte ne distruge complet ce a mai rămas din ţară. Am ajuns ca ‘adevărul’ să fie dictat prin ‘lege’ şi cine are o altă părere face puşcărie. Că asa-i în democraţie.
În acelaşi timp, ultimii naţionalişti sînt incriminaţi ca fiind ai ruşilor sau ai cine ştie cui. Forţele globaliste au avut şi incă au o mare problemă: nu prea au bau-bau. Nu cît le-ar trebui. Au fost Sovieticii. Au speriat lumea aratînd spre aia. S-a terminat cu ei şi n-au mai avut subiect de speriat lumea. Au inventat teroriştii. Se cam răcise şi cu aia. După ce vezi un terorist că moarte în mai multe atentate şi apoi apare înbrăcat în poliţst la următorul, ar trebui să te întrebi, printre altele mai importante, dacă s-a făcut reducere de costuri la Hollywood.

            Ca să nu lungim introducerea, intrăm în subiect.
Începem de la Burebista. Tinutul de sub conducerea lui era Tracia, cu locuitori traci. Poporul geto-dac sub forma prezentată azi este o invenţie. Dacii erau o mică bucăţică din total. Tracia se întindea pîna la Olbia şi Nipru în Est, pîna la Tisa în Vest şi pîna la Cracovia în Nord.
Limba lui Burebista s-a menţinut cel mai bine în Lituania, ţara de piatră, ţara tracilor neslavizaţi. Oraşul Trache şi rîul Alutas vă sună un pic cunoscute ca denumire ? Investigaţi pe cont propriu !

            Să mergem un pic mai departe în istorie. Dăm de prima falsitate majoră dar şi cea mai mare: latinizarea/romanizarea. Nu a existat asa ceva. Teritoriul administrat de romani după înfrîngerea lui Decebal era sub 14% din suprafaţa Traciei. Administrat, nu ocupat.
După retragerea aureliană, acolo au rămas două legiuni romane: a 13-a Gemina şi a 5-a Macedonica. Cică cu două prăpadite de legiuni s-a produs latinizare şi romanizare. Falsitate grosolană. E ca şi cum ai zice că în Dobrogea vin două garnizoane de chinezi ca să ne menţină pacea şi dupa 200 de ani toată România vorbeşte chineză. Vedeţi absurditatea ? Incepeţi să vă dezmeticiţi ?
Ca fapt divers, limba latină este derivaţie din cea tracică, nu invers, lucru recunoscut de altfel chiar de Împăratul Traian.
Tot ca fapt divers, romanii erau aia barbari, nu tracii şi nu dacii. Romanii mîncau, beau şi borau ca porcii, după care cica se duceau la luptă. Au fost civilizaţi cu parul, milităreşte, de către împaraţii care au considerat ca e timpul de ordine şi disciplină. Prea puţin şi prea tîrziu.
Cît despre denumirea de roman, asta avea după ceva timp cu totul alta semnificaţie decît se crede. Roman, la modul general, însemna să fii cetaţean liber, să ai drept de a purta armă. În Imperiul Roman, erai ori roman ori sclav. Variante intermediare nu existau. Semnificaţia cuvîntului s-a extins în timp şi în afara graniţelor imperiului. Denumirea s-a folosit în alte teritorii ocupate fără vreun fel semnificaţie etnică. A rezultat astfel multă confuzie.

            De aici o să sarim un pic la 1600, la Mihai Viteazul, vreme cînd exista conştiinţă naţională (spre deosebire de azi). Mihai Viteazul este de departe cel mai epic conducător pe care l-au avut teritoriile noastre vreodată. A caştigat singur împotriva tuturor. E ca şi cum s-ar bate acum România cu China, Rusia şi SUA şi ar cîştiga. Vi s-ar părea că se poate ? Dacă se merită vreodată sarbătorită vreo zi naţională a ţării, asta ar trebui aleasă 6 Iulie.
Evident că pseudo-istoricii şi pe el încearcă sa-l corupă, sa-l denatureze din p.d.v. istoric. Doar că nu prea au cum, pentru că este foarte clar că el a fost singurul din toată lumea din toate timpurile care s-a batut cu cele 3 mari imperii ale vremii şi nu a pierdut. Din contră, a unit teritoriile noastre – ţara Muntenească, Transilvania şi ţara Moldovei (că româneşiti erau toate 3, Valahii – ţări ale românilor) – într-unul singur.
Bineînteles că Europei nu i-a priit asta. Nu se doreau nici atunci cum nu se doresc acum nici atât ţări mari şi puternice. Logica este simplă: dacă-s marunte şi vai de ele le poţi controla. Dacă devin mari şi tari, nu mai poţi. Trebuie să le cucereşti prin sabie. Iar daca sînt prea puternice să faci asta, atunci ai o mare problemă: trebuie să recurgi la cu totul alte strategii.
Din moment ce în luptă dreaptă nu l-au putut înfrînge, au recurs la fapte mişeleşti. Ordinul de asasinare a fost dat direct din Praga, care era sub control german. De fapt, cam toţi marii conducători ai ţinutului nostru au fost asasinaţi sau eliminaţi fara pic de onoare: Burebista, Mihai Viteazul, Antonescu, Ceausescu şi mulţi alţii.
D-astea s-au întîmplat şi pe la case mai bine-vazute. Cîteva exemple externe: Louis XVI, Tarul Nicolas, J.F.K, Gaddafi. Nimic nu ar fi fost posibil fără lucrătură din interior. Eticheta aia de dictator des atribuită unor conducători eliminaţi e o absurditate, e o aberaţie. E ca şi cum ai zice că preşedintele Kennedy a fost un dictator. Dar azi mai nimeni nu mai gîndeşte …

            Asasinarea e doar una din tacticile folosite de-a lungul timpului pentru obiectivul general de a controla ţări. Pe lîngă asta, se foloseşte foarte mult şi segmentarea pe cît posibil a teritoriilor. Normal că cele două au o strînsă legătură: odată ce ai scăpat de un conducător, de un lider ce menţinea unitatea, e mult mai simplu să segmentezi o zonă, o ţară. Dacă cumva e dificil să faci asta (Fidel Castro a trecut cu bine de minim 400 de incercări de asasinat, chiar peste 600 după unele surse), mai există metode ajutătoare suplimentare. Una de bază este inventarea de denumiri de teritorii, zone geografice, chiar popoare. La noi s-au inventat la greu.
Nu putem spune că s-a inventat poporul geto-dac deoarece ăsta era efectiv o mică parte din totalul poporului trac. Aici e doar o suprascriere de denumire generală. Dar clar s-a inventat denumirea de popor moldovenesc. Urmeză cel ardelenesc. Poporul moldovenesc e o invenţie de pe vremea lui Stalin, care prostimea de la noi a susţinut-o şi a dezvoltat-o. Acum, în loc să avem români de peste prut, avem moldoveni din Moldova. Tactica le-a funcţionat, ne-au divizat.

Ia să vedem un pic cu teritoriile: Bucovina – invenţie a serviciilor secrete germane din 1775. Vă aduceţi aminte de războiul ruso-turco-german ? E, pe timpurile alea, zona respectivă era un district militar al Moldovei de Nord. Au venit serviciile germane cu ideea de a numi zona aia Ducatul Bucovina.

Basarabia – invenţie ţaristă din 1807. Apărută în urma tratativelor cu Napoleon I.

Banat şi popor bănăţean ? Altă invenţie. Zona originală era de 10 ori mai mare decît ce se numeşte azi Banat. Altă tactică de a asigura segmentarea.

Ucraina – cea mai mare invenţie din zonă şi la propriu şi la figurat. Ucraina a fost creată luînd estul de la rusi şi vestul de la vecini: de la români, polonezi, lituanieni. Acest fapt e confirmat recent şi de Putin (care a spus clar că e invenţie a serviciilor austro-ungaro-germane). Doar că ai noşstri s-au facut că nu aud. S-a dus la d-aia mai mari şi a repetat-o.
Cuvîntul provine din slavonă (ucra) însemnînd la margine. Acolo trăiesc români în peste 200 000 Km^2. Nu uitaţi că ţara Moldovei se întindea pînă la Nipru.
Cum au dispărut teritoriile ei ? Păi uite aşa: La 12 Septembrie 1740 s-au dus 44 000 Km^2 (teritoriu românesc de la sud de Kiev, pînă la Nipru); s-a mutat hotarul pe Bug. Apoi în 29 Decenbrie 1791 (pe timpul revoluţiei franceze, revoluţie sponsorizată cu aur luat de la noi) – 69 000 Km^2, s-a mutat hotarul pe Nistru. În final la 16/28 mai 1812 (aşa zisa Basarabie, adică rămăşiţele de vest) s-a mutat hotarul pe Prut. Rămăşiţele de estici ‘ucraineni’, au fost azi transformate într-un nou popor inventat ‘nistrean’, iar a celor dintre Prut şi Nistru, într-o alta invenţie ‘poporul moldovenesc’, proces încă aflat în plină desfăşurare.
Sînt multe alte teriotorii care nu le mai avem, pierdute. Inclusiv Maramureşul istoric a rămas doar jumatate din ce era pe vremuri. Schema generală este clară, nu mai are rost să înşirăm toate bucaţelele. Ar trebui de asemenea să vă fie clar e că teritoriile vestice (Partiumul) cu Banatul, Crişana, Maramureşul istoric, Transilvania (1699), o perioadă Oltenia (1718-1739) şi Nordul Moldovei (1775) numit apoi ‘Bucovina’ (1786) au cazut sub ocupaţie germană, cum au căzut cele estice sub ocupaţie rusă.

Ca fapt oarecare, ungur este termen românesc, provine de la cetatea Ungului, iar primul rege al ungurilor, Sf. Stefan, era român.

            Segmentările recente nu s-au mai facut neaapărat prin război, ci prin ‘revoluţii’. O revoluţie, după cerinţele actuale, se încheie cînd un sistem jurudic ticălos e înlocuit de altul şi mai ticălos. Se vede limpede la noi in Europa asta. Revoluţiile recente nu au avut ca scop decît destabilizarea, cedarea controlului ţărilor şi în final desfiinţarea lor.

Apropos de d-astea, o tentativa de distrugere a României a fost pe 13 iunie 1990. Au fost mii de indivizi infiltraţi; agenţi străini cu nume români cu scop precis de a pune pe tron pe cine trebuie. Iliescu trebuia să fie de tranziţie, nu permanent.
Oare de ce s-au distrus intenţionat sedii de poliţie ? Păi să dispară documentele infiltratorilor. Pe 14-15 de fapt a avut loc contracararea schimbarii lui Iliescu. Probabil mineriada a salvat ţara de la ceva mult mai nasol.
Culmea e ca scenariul de la Bucureşti s-a mutat la Belgrad. Rezultatul: destrămarea Iugoslaviei. Astfel, pe 25 iunie 1991 are loc separarea Croaţiei şi a Sloveniei. Pe 8 septembrie 1991: separarea Republicii Macedonia. Pe 1 martie 1992: separarea Bosniei şi Herţegovinei. 3 iunie 2006: separarea Muntenegrului. 5 Iunie 2006: destrămarea statului Serbia şi Muntenegru. 17 februarie 2008: separarea regiunii Kosovo.
Asta voriau nenorociţii şi cu România. N-au reuşit din prima, dar şi-au adaptat tactica.

            Tentative de feliere au fost extrem de multe şi au fost posibile prin trădare.
Spre exemplu, trădarea din 1881: renunţarea la teritoriile de dincolo de carpaţi pentru interesele germane. Carol I n-a fost asa de breaz cum se zice. (Aici mai există o confuzie: între monarhie şi regalitate. Regalitatea nu a fost adusa de Carol I. Regalitatea de tip barbaric-germana e una, monarhia autohtonă alta.) Carol I a venit în ţară în izmene. Deşi în mîna Brătienilor, el a fost cinstit, a continuat reformele lui Cuza (care mare parte îi sînt atribuite lui pe nedrept). Tradarea lui constă în faptul că în toamna lui 1883, în urma tratativelor de alianţă cu Austro-Ungaria, a renunţat definitiv la provinciile româneşti deţinute la acel moment de austro-ungari, provincii care le promisese lor în 1881.

Un alt exemplu: În primăvara anului 1923, Parlamentul României a votat Constituţia Statului Unitar Român, înlocuind-o pe cea din 1866. Iuliu Maniu, unul din marii trădători, a fost împotriva acestei decizii şi, în consecinţă, nu a votat-o. Liderul ţărănist a refuzat să participe la încoronarea Regelui Ferdinand şi a Reginei Maria, la 15 octombrie 1922, la Alba Iulia. Tot el l-a introdus clandestin în ţară pe Carol Caraiman, după ce Parlamentul îl eliminase de la succesiunea tronului, în 1926, proclamîndu-l pe Rege al Romaniei, inaugurînd astfel un regim corupt şi uzurpator, care a dus la sfîrtecarea graniţelor ţării. Iuliu Maniu e cel care a semnat în 1938 documentul initial pentru dezlipirea Ardealui de România. Istoricii Gheorghe Buzatu şi Mihai Retegan au publicat în volumul ‘Istorie şi societate’ extrasul ştatului de plată care atestă calitatea de agent britanic platit al lui Iuliu Maniu (nume de cod Tom), document aflat în Arhivele Britanice. Iuliu maniu a urmărit orice fel de interese, doar pe ale ţării nu. Dar are statuie …

            ‘Rumânia’, cum este trecută în vechile cronici germane, se întindea, pe vremea lui Carol cel Mare (rege 768-800, apoi împarat 800-814) între Tisa şi Nipru, între Carpaţii Paduroşi şi Pind, dar nu era limitată ca populaţie strict la acele repere. Românii depăşiseră aceste bariere, fiind atestaţi, cu structuri statale, în Răsărit pâna la fluviul cu nume românesc-VOLGA şi râul ‘Volohov’ dintre Novgorod şi Ladoga, în Apus pâna la ‘marea’ pannona cu nume românesc-Balaton, în Nord pâna la Baltica, fiind elementul despărţitor între slavo-finici şi germani, marturie stînd sutele de localităţi cu nume specific din Cehia, Galiţia, Podolia, Lodomeria, Saxonia, Silezia, Slovacia, Volhinia şi în Sud până în Beotia şi Focida, cândva localităţi trace.

            Împărţiri şi felieri s-au întîmplat peste tot în lume, dar putem lua exemple mai recente de pe lîngă noi: Cehoslovacia a fost prea mare, au tăiat-o. Iugoslavia la fel. Le-au feliat să le poată controla. Regatul sârbo-croato-sloven e acelaşi popor cu aceaşi limbă.
Ideea globaliştilor e că statele trebuie să devină nişte SRL-uri mici controlate de ei, pline de sclavi, unde ei să dicteze tot ce mişcă. Vor să controleze toate aspectele vieţii în cel mai totalitar mod posibil: cît şi ce mănînci, cît dormi, cît munceşti, ce vezi, ce auzi, ce simţi. Cu tehnologia actuală o să se ajungă la situaţii aşa de ‘smart’ încît vor contoriza şi aerul respirat şi cît rahat o să curgă prin WC-uri. Iar ca om de rînd, nu cumva să începi să iţi baţi capul cu lucruri importante … se ocupă ei de asta. TV-ul se uită la tine.
Euro-regiuni ? Haha … oare de ce. E … tot d-aia … să fie felierea mai simplă.
S-a încercat şi la d-aia mari şi tari: Quebec-ul în Canada, Scoţia în Marea Britanie, dar şi pe la italieni şi alţii. Au scăpat, momentan.

            Problema e că de cîte ori zici adevărul sar toţi boivacii că conspiraţii şi nuştiu-ce buhuhu. Realtatea e aşa de dură încît nici o minte nu ar putea concepe în totalitate ce se întîmplă. Tendinţa boilor şi vacilor de acum e să urmeze turma, turmă care ţipă că vor UE, NATO, americani, scuturi şi alte căcăţişuri care nu ajută decît la îngroparea definitivă şi irevocabilă a ţării.
NATO a fost ceva creat sub pretextul contracarării sovieticilor. Din momentul destrămării U.R.S.S., NATO nu a mai avut nici scop nici rost. Aşadar, NATO a început să caute alţi adversari. A contribuit la bombardare, destrămarea, dezbinare şi jaf în multiple ţări. S-a inventat şi terorismul, ca să existe bau-bau, să îşi mai justifice existenţa în continuare. A început să scîrţîie şi asta. S-a prins lumea mai inteligentă că absolut toate marile atacuri teroriste au fost organizate chiar de serviciile statelor respective, în frunte cu ăla de la 11 Septembrie. Îmi pare rău de proştii care mai cred în propagandă, dar fizica de bază este fizică incontestabilă şi oricîtă propaganda ai fabrica, dovezile vorbesc de la sine. Fierul nu poate deveni lichid dîndu-i foc cu kerosen, plastice şi cartoane, oricît ai incerca si cu orice cantitate ai folosi, la fel cum un obiect nu poate cădea liber mai rapid decît ar face-o în vid. Restul e poveste SF.
Bun, deci am lamurit: scopul actual NATO e să facă jaf la ordin … şi asta face cu mult succes. Să-l vedem un pic pe cel al UE. Păi vorbeam într-un articol precedent ce e UE: o nouă Uniune Sovietică. Spuneam şi că o să crape inevitabil. E … crapă. Teoretic a murit de prin 2003 cînd în locul Franţei a preluat puterea Germania şi a făcut ce a vrut din ea. Deci se poate spune că Uniunea actuală se numeşte mai degrabă Uniunea Germano-Europeană. De la lozinca UE: ‘go home yankes !’ s-a ajuns la a primi invadatori. Să vă fie clar, SUA, pe lîngă sabotajul economic, a sponsorizat şi invazia migratorilor, exact pentru a destabiliza UE din interior…şi a reuşit. Au venit ‘săracii’ bombardaţi cu smart phone-uri, haine de firmă şi euroi în buzunar să faca ce vor şi să se plîngă că ei sînt într-o situaţie super grea. Păcăleala încă ţine. UGE se duce pe măciucă foarte artistic. Aia mai tari şobolani părăsesc barca, d-aia Marea Britanie le-a zis pa. Franţa şi Germania vor mai profia pe cît posibil iar restul o să rămînă cu datoriile. România probabil o să fie printre ultimii care suportă consecinţele. Sistemul piramidal numit UE ne va costa foarte scump. Ca să înţelegeţi cum funcţionează studiaţi termenul de ‘schemă ponzi’.

            Boii şi vacile de la noi au vrut neaapărat în sistemul ăsta. Asta s-a întîmplat din două motive: cotizaţia care s-a dat boivacilor de la conducere şi inconştienţa boivacilor de la orice nivel. Boivacii sînt confuzi rău. Majoritatea confundă comunismul cu socialismul, libertatea cu democraţia, capitalismul cu posibilitatea de a face o afacere cinstită şi privatizarea cu prosperitatea.

Să le luăm pe rînd:

Pe 24 Noiembrie 1936, Stalin procalmă victoria socialismului, care e ceva naţionalist. Stalin vîna comuniştii. Care au reuşit au scăpat. Au ajuns apoi prin ţări vestice, unde au pus mîna pe putere ş au creat sistemul actual de supra-corporaţii. Neoconservatorismul, globalismul … sînt creaţiile lor. Despre comunismul total ne vorbea Marx, care spunea că acesta va apărea în cea mai capitaista tara (SUA) prin concentrarea la vîrf a capitalurilor care ajung să depăşească statul ca putere, iar ca urmare statul va trebui să dispară.
Multinaţionalele suprastatale n-au mamă, tată, principii umane sau pic de onoare şi vor să desfiinţeze toate ţarile iar pe cetăţenii lor să îi transforme în sclavi. Sorosiştii, ca denumire generică, înseamnă exact asta.
Umanitatea ca întreg nu are cum să supravieţuiască într-un sistem care este contra socialismului. Soluţia Sorosiştilor pentru asta e dictatura completă care se pune în practică folosind aşa-zisa democraţie. Termenul, în contextul internaţional actual, pare să provină de la ‘demo’ / demonstrativ (cautaţi ‘demo version’ pe internet să vedeţi despre ce-i vorba). Adica ţi se prezintă de la distanţă ceva frumos ambalat, îl testezi, studiezi, îţi place, dar cînd îl cumperi şi il desfaci e de fapt un căcat care pute. Dacă cumva comentezi, ţi se arată că pe stoc mai există şi altfel de căcat, un pic diferit colorat, dar cu acelaşi gust şi miros. Iar boivacii se bucură că au de ales şi mănîncă cu spor tot căcatul. Apoi se duc şi mai cumpără unul, că e la ofertă. Dacă cumva nu cumperi, ţi se va da gratis, iar daca nici atunci nu te convingi, ţi se va băga pe gît cu lopata, forţat.
Cam aşa e cu democraţia. Aşa a fost lumea păcălită în 1989 la lovitura de stat: s-a promis libertate şi s-a oferit democraţie. Mii de militari care ştiau prea multe au dispărut din 90 doar în cîţiva ani cu diverse ‘cancere’. Nu cumva să comenteze ceva. Să nu vă faceţi iluzii, nu exista absolut nici un fel de libertate astăzi. Faptul ăsta e confirmat şi de ‘legile’ actuale, inclusiv şi mai ales la noi în România. Vedeţi articolul cu dictaturometrul. Adevărul e dictat prin lege, iar contestarea lui te duce la puşcărie. Mai nou avem şi un Minister al Adevărului Online, care are ca scop să bage la puşcarie pe ăştia care mai contestă pe net dictatura şi ‘adevărurile’ ei.

Am ajuns la capitolul capitalismului…care eu l-am numit capigtalism din motive evidente.
Capigtalismul care se manifestă azi în lume nu are nici un fel de legtură cu economia, libertatea de a face afaceri sau prosperitatea. Capigtalismul este ceva creat de la început cu un singur scop: să transforme oamenii 99% în sclavi în beneficiul a celorlalţi 1%.
In SUA s-a cam realizat obiectivul: top 1% din borfaşi au mai mulţi bani ca cei 95% din partea de jos a clasamentului. Mai există totuşi un 4% zonă de tampon între cele două categorii. Aia e categoria lor de mijloc, efectiv.
În momentul ăsta, SUA probabil mai reuşeşte încă să lupte un pic sub Trump. Altfel, Rusia ar fi rămas singură împotriva ultracorporatiştilor globalişti. Pericolul e urmatorul: Trump să fie asasinat (dar momentan e susţinut de armată) iar SUA să se separe în vreo 7 state. Pe termen lung ăsta e planul. Dar măcar asta ar fi benefic pentru alte ţări care ar scapa de bombardamente şi jaf.
La noi, treaba stă şi mai trist. Politicienii noştri-s cu dosar la americani cam toţi. Merg acolo cu saru-mîna să fie formataţi şi programaţi bine cu ce au de făcut. Unde s-a dus Iohanis dupa ce a furat alegerile ? Pai… în SUA. În SUA e mare lucru că a caştigat Trump. L-a flituit pe Soros, cum l-au flituit şi din Ungaria şi din chiar din Israel. Asta e o schimbare radicală în atitudine, iar pe ăştia de la noi ce se întîmplă i-a băgat în totală ceaţă.

A rămas să discutăm de privatizare. Asta a avut scop clar şi bine definit de a face toată infrastructura ţării praf. Asta a făcut excelent. S-a donat tot. Am ajuns o ţara falită, înfrîntă, ocupată şi distrusă, cu bogaţiile luate de străini şi cu ordin general de a fi segmentaţi ca alţi vecini. În aproape 30 de ani de ocupaţie străină s-a produs dezumanizarea, s-a produs distrugerea tuturor valorilor la absolut orice capitol posibil. Nimeni de-a lungul istoriei noastre nu şi-ar fi imaginat că este posibil aşa ceva. Iar majoritatea azi nici nu-s conştienţi de asta…sau dacă sînt îi doare-n cot.
Cine comentează de asta e făcut comunist, nazist, orice, numai român nu. Ca român nu trebuie să ai nimic. Pamîntul l-au furat în proporţie de peste 60%, iar cea mai mare parte din P.I.B. nu mai aparţine de mult ţării, se duce tot în afară. Cum s-a dus şi aurul B.N.R. Nu doar banii ajung afară, ci şi marfa, materia primă, proprietăţile în sine. Iar aia nici macar taxe nu plătesc … ei au scutiri pentru că oferă locuri de sclavie.
Pentru asta au fost ‘revoluţiile spontane’. Adică loviturile de stat. Astea au fost pregatite de 25-30 de ani dinainte. Au aparut aceleaşi ‘teorii’ şi doctrine în toate tarile din Europa de Est. Tactica s-a aplicat aprope identic în cam toate şi noi am ieşit cei mai şifonaţi.
Normal ca bijniţarilor suprastatali le convine privatizarea. Ei pun mîna gratis pe tot, transformă populaţia locală în sclavi şi menţin ordinea prin dictatură, prin mijloace de opresiune. Jandarmeria la noi e jandarmerie doar nu numele. De fapt ei sînt forţe opresive de securitate. Nivelul cel mai de jos, de impunere cu forţa a dictaturii. Mai sus avem ‘legi’, controlate tot de ei, care dau drepturi depline tuturor mai puţin românilor.
Tactica se vede clar: în timp ce forţele opresive de securitate au primit dotare excelentă în ultimii ani, armata a primit în dotare epave plutitoare şi cele mai prabuşite avioane din lume pe timp de pace, F16, care nici nu ar trebui să mai fie în uz. Unităţile militare sînt păzite de firme private … de nişte burtoşi care dorm în scaune la intrare. Poliţia n-a mai primit nici veste de protecţie. În halul ăsta s-a ajuns. Evident, se face dotare pentru mijloacele de opresiune, nu pentru cele care ar trebui să apere ţara sau cetăţenii.

Dacă cumva credeaţi că există scăpare în altă directţi, respectiv Biserica … vă amăgiţi. Biserica, la fel de bine, poate fi condusă de niste corupţi, exact ca şi sistemul politic. Deci nu vă puneţi baza mare nici în asta. E tot parte integrată din manipulare. Biserica a menţinut deseori dezbinare acolo unde nu trebuia să existe. Nu are rost să mai menţionam cît s-a omorît în numele ei. Aceaşi tactică de segmentare e folosită şi de religii.

            La modul general, oamenii se tem acum de invazii al unor forţe armate externe (că aşa e impus de propagandă). Dar ei dorm linistiţi cu gîndul că dimineaţă răsare soarele, că liderii lor se asigură că o totul să fie bine. Asta doar dacă nu chiar ei sînt invadatorii…

Apropos de lideri şi prosperitate: cine şi de ce a dat cu flit la Southstream ? Efectul la asta a fost că luăm gaz de 3 ori mai scump de la nemţi decît iau ungurii de la ruşi. Aşa-zişii lideri care comit chestii d-astea sînt pre-aleşi cu mult înainte. Exemplu recent: Ponta ştia cu luni bune înainte de alegeri … pardon … selecţii că o să piardă. Dovada există inclusiv pe youtube.
La lovitura de stat finlizată cu puneara lui Iohanis pe tron nici nu s-au numărat voturi; decizia finală era data cu 20 de zile înainte. Asta ca să fie iaraşi clar aspectul ăsta cu ‘demo’.
Forţele oculte n-au reusit sa ne ia încă aeroportul Otopeni, Portul Constanţa şi sistemul energetic. Au incercat cu ajutorul guvernului Cioroş … dar n-au reuşit. În 2014 la alegeri ar fi vrut să aplice un plan asemănător cu cel al lui Hitler cu incendierea Reichstagului … doar că Ponta a recunoscut că e învins dinaite şi s-a mai evitat o catastrofă. Cel puţin temporar… că apoi au testat substanţe militare incendiare la clubul Colectiv, unde iar au încercat să creeze destabilizare şi iar au luat ţeapă că a demisonat Ponta.

Acum securiştii germani vechi se întorc şi alaturi de aia din SUA fac propagandă şi diversiune aici.
Tineretul boivacimii acţionează la ordinul asasinilor: protestează că au disparut 100 de taxe, că au burse de 3 ori mai mari, că au gratuitate CFR, ca s-au mai creat vreo 80 000 de locuri muncă, ca se tinde să se ajungă la pensii decente.
Între timp, koveşistii te pot aresta, iţi pot inventa dosare, te pot acuza indirect şi condamna tot aşa. Da, pot să te aresteze la ordinul preşedintelui şi atît, doar aşa…că se dă ordin. Mai noi au pus gheara şi pe internet. La americani există în justiţe exprimarea aia ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ care înseamnă că dacă eşti condamnat s-a dovedit dincolo de orice urmă de îndoiala că eşti vinovat.
La noi, se implementează ‘la zdup după prima bănuială’ cu ordinul politic în braţe. Să nu inţelegeţi aici că apăr pe cineva. Exclus. Toţi care au ajuns la puşcărie prin ordin politic erau mai mult decît vinovaţi … de multe altele dacă nu de ce erau acuzaţi.
Dar nu asta e ideea…ci că ei o pot face. E vorba de principiu, nu de aplicare. Ei pot elimina pe oricine, oricînd si prin orice mijloace. La fel cum la americani l-au eliminat pe JFK, la fel cum CIA a eliminat prin ‘cancer’ in 5 ani vreo 10 prepreşedinţi din America Latină şi de Sud. La fel cum mai ales in ultimii 3 ani in SUA au fost asasinaţi / sinucişi sute de doctori şi cercetători, la fel cum l-au otrăvit pe Vadim cu cafeaua… asta după ce l-au falimentat şi după ce propaganda l-a făcut praf în ochii lumii.
Tacticile acum sînt mai avansate: nu se rentează să ii elimini, decît în situaţii excepţionale. Mai au baieţii conturi, afaceri, se rentează mai mult sa le dai o pauză de activitate. Iese cotă-parte.
Revenind, dacă ar exista cu adevărat justiţie, ar trebui să fie acuzaţi cam 1 milion de persoane în România. Din ei, o destulă parte de subminarea economiei şi înaltă tradare. Dacă ar exista cu adevărat justiţie, ar trebui ca pedepsele pentru persoanele din funcţii de conducere sa aiba pedepse cel puţin triple la orice, nu scutiri sau reduceri.
Rostul unui guvern este să asigure bunăstarea cetăţenilor: locuinţă, locuri de muncă, prosperitate, salarii decente, învaţămînt, pensii decente, sănătate. Daca nu o face este trădător de ţară ! Exact ca la noi, unde au distrus şi sistemul de sănătate şi învăţămîntul, unde au implementat munca aproape gratis şi pensii de toată ruşinea … şi unde au transformat fiecare aspect al societăţii în metodă de exploatare a cetaţenilor şi de a face bani pe cîrca lor prin orice mijloace, inclusiv genocid.
O justiţie corectă n-ar ţine cont de partide, pupincurisme, televiziuni şi afaceri. Aia ar fi justiţie, nu circul care e la noi.

            În peste 25 de ani de jaf naţional n-a protestat nimeni împotriva distrugerii industriei, infrastructurii generale, împotriva jefuirii pamîntului, padurilor, tuturor sistemelor de producţiie sau împotriva donării infrastructurii strategice.
N-a protestat nici un fakeboocist nici la genocidul împotriva copiilor din Argeş. Aia care au murit datorită vaccinarii experimentale … nu a cîrîit nimeni. Au pasat vina din lapte-în apă pînă nu au mai avut ce să scornească.
Ca să se răcească, l-au arestat pe Guru, brusc. Reclamă cîteva zile şi s-a răcit tot. A uitat lumea repede de copiii aia. Staţi liniştiţi că mai au cîteva chestii gen Guru pe stoc, în caz de ceva mai se scoate cîte o d-asta de la naftalină şi se mai raceşte un subiect … şi uite aşa funcţionează manipularea boivăcimii.
Cînd au venit unii pe bune la proteste, spre exemplu cînd au venit ‘basarabenii’ ca vor unire … i-au batut, amendat şi trimis acasă. Asta e difernţa între un protest real şi unul sponsorizat de opresori.
Aştia care protestează acu escortaţi de poliţie în Piata Înfrîngerii şi nici autorizaţie nu aveau. Aşa e cînd ai mulţi manipulaţi de tradatori vechi care au în spate servicii străine ce servesc interese globaliste.
La noi dacă măcar ar exista opoziţe, ar veni cu alte idei … poate mai bune sau nu, dar ar fi altele. Asta ar trebui să facă: să prezinte alternative, nu să ţipe ‘vreau demisia lui X sau Y’.
Dar cum ţoti sînt în aceaşi oală, nu va schimba nimeni nimic. Nu există interesul pentru asta. Toate partidele mari servesc aceiaşi globalişti. Omului … sau bouvacului îi rămîne în continuare iluzia că el ‘alege’.
Iar în timp ce boivacii de rînd se joacă de-a stînga-dreapta, boivacii de mai sus bine platiţi se asigură ca totul se falsifică în continuare şi că iluzia e batută în cuie. Dezbină şi cucereşte de la A la Z.

            Dacă tragem linie să ne gîndim cu ce ne-am ales, abia atunci constatăm cît de gravă este situaţia: În loc de libertate avem sclavie, în loc de prosperitate sărăcie, în loc cultură tembelizor şi în loc de istorie avem ‘adevăr’ dictat prin ‘lege’.
Vă place ce a ieşit ? Mie nu !

            Cunoaşterea inamicului este în zilele noastre factorul esenţial pentru supravieţuire. Lupta actuală este una între ce a mai rămas din state cu urme de naţionalism pe de-o parte şi puterile globale suprastatale (cu bani aproape infiniţi, care se folosesc de armate de cotropire – armata americanilor, armata NATO pentru a jefui statele opozante) pe de alta.
Ăsta este singurul mare război, care după nivelul de gravitate poate fi lejer considerat al 3-lea război mondial. Restul e spectacol, circ, frecţie.

Nu uitaţi ce zicea Ceauşescu: Scrieţi istoria adevărată !
Voi măcar citiţi-o … că altfel se pierde.

Posted in Mind Wars | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Boi si Vaci Episodul 7: Cireada la protest

         Datorita intamplarilor recente, a zbaterilor de peste pe uscat, a behaitului oilor … sau oricum vreti sa numiti mai artistic activitatile astea de asa-zis protest, uitati ca mai apare un episod cu si despre boivaci.

Interesant de data asta este ca s-a ajuns la un nivel de formatare asa de eficient incit unii boivaci se cred mult mai cu mot decit altii. Respectiv, boivacii care mugeta in Piata Infringerii (pardon, asa-numita a Victoriei altora asupra poporului roman) se cred mai tari si mai destepti decit boivacii care mugeta sa demisioneze presedintele.

Asadar, boivacii de pesudo-nivel 2 (care-s practic cel mult de nivel 1 ca si aialati) se manifesta care cum poate … ca sa iasa un spectacol cit mai frumos pentru a 3-a categorie de boivaci, aia care urmaresc la tembelizor cum mugeta celelalte doua categorii. Imi aminteste faza asta de aia din serialul de desene animate South Park in care vin unii la protest cu un teanc de pancarde, intreaba ce se protesteaza acolo si selecteaza lozinca corespunzatoare protestului.

Nimeni din niciuna dintre cele 3 categorii nu are de fapt habar nici macar care-i planul boivacilor alora de nivel 2, de un pic mai sus decit ei (adica aia care au fata de ei si bani). Si nici atat nu vor stii vreodata despre ce se intimpla si mai sus, acolo unde se decide de fapt tot, indiferent de numarul de categorii de boivaci care participa sau nu la circ.

         Bineinteles ca de istorie sau cultura habar nu au. Daca i-ai intreba ceva relevant ti-ar zice ca Dracula a fost un domnitor la Moldovei care le dadea teapa turcilor (poate chiar rusilor), sau ceva foarte asemanator.

A spus un filozof acum vreo 2000 si ceva de ani ca definitia nebuniei este sa faci continuu acelasi lucru si sa astepti rezultate diferite. Pai boivacii ce-au facut ? Au ras-votat intre aceleasi partide asa-zise de stinga sau de dreapta, care de fapt sint in exact aceasi oala de la inceput si nu urmaresc decit sa dea cit mai bine cu saru-mana si sa pupe cururi pe cine-stie unde.

Boivacii aia din Piata Infringerii sint cei mai retardati din punctul asta de vedere. Ei cred ca daca cireada ar fi fost mai mare cind s-a votat, ar fi iesit labarii (pardon liberalii ras-redenumiti) si ar fi facut si dres aia.

E … teapa. E o dubla iluzie. Prima iluzie e ca aialalti ar fi facut ceva fata de actualii … iar a doua iluze e ca votul lor ar fi contat la ceva. Dragi boivaci, cistigatorul la presedentie se stia de luni bune inainte (dovada e pe YouTube, pot detalia pentru cine vrea), iar cu vreo 3 saptamini inainte se stiau rezultatele exacte.

         Cele 3 categorii de boivaci nu realizeaza nici faptul ca tactica ‘dezbina si cucereste’ e valabila de cind lumea. Si e normal …. s-a indeplinit un mare obiectiv in tara: sa dispara invatamintul decent si sa aiba toti un IQ cit un ciine. Dar, bineinteles, sa aiba si diploma, sa se vada ‘desteptaciunea’ boivacilor.

Asadar, boivacii din categoria 1 care se cred din categoria 2 vor dinadins sa faca altfel. Ei nu vor sa moara spinzurati, vor sa moara pe scaun electric. Sau invers, nici ei nu stiu, dar ei vor oricum ar fi sa fie aialalta varianta. Unul nu vede ca rezultatul e tot ala … sau chiar unul mai rau.

Boivacii astia si-au inventat o alta realitate, cu ajutorul fakebook, unde ei se simt foarte bine pentru ca pot mugeta (doar la ordin, pentru ca daca vor spune ceva concret, fakebook-ul le opreste imediat mugetarea).

Ei nu vor realiza niciodata cel mai de baza lucru si anume ca toata conducerea politica din Romania e vinduta indiferent de culoare politica sau opinie publica. Ei fac orice fel de politica, numai una in interesul tarii nu. Dupa orice definitie, toti trebuie acuzati de inalta tradare. Normal ca boivacii nu vad asta. E o chestie de baza dar care le depaseste cu destul limitele intelegerii.

         Concluzia e una si clara: au mers la protest boi si s-au intors vaci, sau invers.

Treaba e foarte trista ca si daca le-ai zice adevarul, ar sari toti boivacii ca conspiratii si nustiu-ce. Realitatea e asa de dura ca n-ar pricepe vreodata nici macar 1% din ce se intampla. Dar ei mugeta in continuare, iar in timpul asa ONG-urile Soroiste isi vad de treaba si cu ajutorul a citeva zeci de mii de oameni vind in continuare tara felie cu felie. Apropos, organizatiile astea cu Soros cu tot si-au luat flit complet si in SUA si in Ungaria.

Posted in Neutral Zone | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

[Epic] – You have been deceived: the Jedi are evil !

     Today’s world is a world run by deception and the self-proclaimed ‘good guys’ that use wars, oppression, genocide and control to do their bidding. In the same manner, the Jedi were regarded by default as the ‘good side’. They’re not even close to that. Now I will prove it.
     A basic Jedi doctrine design flaw and probably the most important ideological aspect is that the Jedi reject half of the possibilities the Force offers, but only to the lower levels. Practically, they deny half of their power implicitly, but note that they do that only of the ones they train. The grand masters will no doubt use it if necessary, as I will explain.

     Let’s start with some basic logic: since many dark side Force users (Sith as in organization, not species) were initially Jedi, doesn’t that mean that the core of the dark side, the dark seed is there and they just managed to activate it ? Well, it does. The 4 Schisms are proof of that, look into the first Jedi Exiles. This is something relatively normal. Some Jedi realized that they are denied from start their true potential and separated from the indoctrinated group. They gained Freedom, and by that I do not mean freedom to do cause chaos, but freedom of choice, which is the most important aspect of any society ever. When you no longer have the freedom of choice, you are under a pure dictatorship. So think about it now: what can you actually choose in your own country ?

     Basic evil trait: the Jedi use brainwashing and manipulation to maintain their status. They practically formatted/brainwashed many in order to have them join. Yeah, they did that to Revan too. That’s evil by any definition.

     The Jedi kidnap children that have Force abilities and put them in their asylum-like academy to be brainwashed (oops…’trained’) into being one of them. The Jedi are a fanatic religious order populated by beings with super-powers raised from infancy to follow a rigid indoctrination philosophy with emotionless zealotry. That’s basically the same premise as the Hitler Youth and Waffen SS. So what does that make the Jedi Council ? A Fascist-Religious organization actively undermining liberty for maintaining their own power. Fascist governments throughout history have proven that the denial truth is a basic form of control and manipulation. The Jedi do exactly that. We’ll dig more into it later. If you have doubts about them kidnapping children take the example of Ludi Billane, a Force sensitive child that was rescued by a team of Jedi rescue workers after an earthquake on Ord Thoden capital city Domitree. They assumed the parents were dead and took her and decided to train her in the ways of the Force. However, the girl’s mother, Jonava Billane, remained alive and when learning upon recovery that the the child had survived, she traveled to Coruscant to seek reunion with her daughter. Jonava Billane petitioned the Jedi Council to be reunited with her daughter Ludi. However, the Jedi Council rejected her petition arguing that they would not give her back her child—now named “Aris-Del Wari”—because it was too dangerous to release one whose mind had been opened to the Force. Really ? Too dangerous for her own mother ? Jedi will usually seek parental permission, but they do have the legal authority to take custody of any force sensitive child they find below a certain age. And what prevents them from Force-persuading a parent ? They ‘honor’ ? The process is done through the Acquisition Division, who mandate mandatory blood tests on all newborn children on Republic Worlds, and if their midichlorian count is higher than normal, that information gets sent back to the temple on Coruscant, where the information is stored on the Kyber Memory Crystal. The Acquisition Division then uses that information to find force sensitive children and take them back to the temple to be trained. If the child is old enough to have formed attachments, they aren’t trained. If they are adults when they’re found and they’re using their powers irresponsibly, they have a choice of joining the order, stopping their use of the force, or being killed. Once a child has been trained in the use of the force, they can never return to their families because it would be considered too dangerous. You don’t have an enforced recruitment division and you don’t enforce blood tests on all children if you’re a light side organization. This is pure Nazi-like style, even worse.
This is what Darth Sidious told young Maul in “The Wrath of Darth Maul”:
‘Many Force users joined the Jedi Order, but the Jedi were not satisfied with their numbers. They sought out the so-called wizards and demons, and gave them three options. Join the Jedi, cease using Force powers, or die.’
‘Join the Jedi.’ Sidious said. ‘Relinquish your individuality and freedom, and fight only when the Jedi tell you to fight. Cease using Force powers. One might as well tell an ordinary life-form to stop living. Die… Well, I don’t believe that requires an explanation. And so, the Jedi not only increased their ranks but destroyed those who disagreed with them.’

     How comes most of the Jedi are Army generals if their objective is pace ? Well… peace is indeed a lie, the Sith were right about that one. In the name of peace, they lead armies that crush any opposition, without mercy and without even considering any peaceful alternatives. (Off-note: USA proved this hands down after the ’90s by bombing and robbing dozens of countries in the name of ‘pace’).

     The Jedi lie frequently and rationalize it as speaking from ‘a different point of view’. When Luke asks ‘How did my father die ?’, Obi-Wan proceeds to tell him that a Jedi named Darth Vader betrayed and murdered Anakin Skywalker, when in truth, Anakin is actually Darth Vader. He also tells Luke that his father wanted him to have his lightsaber, while his father was the Emperor’s apprentice, and that the lightsaber he holds in his hand was taken as his father when he was laying next to a river of lava, nearly dying at the hands of Obi-Wan himself. But when Luke discovers this, Obi-Wan says, ‘What I told you was true, from a certain point of view’. Deception 101. Practically, saying that X kills Y while X is the same as Y is either suicide (not the case) or an epic lie.

     A good example of Jedi manipulation comes directly from Yoda, while training Luke on Dagobah. Yoda states, ‘For once you go down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny’. Now, this is simply untrue. There have been several Jedi who have turned to the Dark Side and returned to the light, including Revan. Which means one of two things: Yoda is either lying to Luke and using this as a scare tactic, or Yoda is lying to himself (which is even worse) because this is the ideology of the Jedi Order.

     The Jedi use invasive mind control. They overwrite (or attempt to) the minds of independent beings to avoid security checkpoints, cheat merchants, convince people change careers, get people out of prison. (Off-note: Ferengi would be immune to this.)

     Getting back to peace and power:
The Jedi want to keep hold of their power no matter the consequences and will not let it go. They led a coup against an elected leader. Chancellor Palpatine was fairly elected as supreme chancellor. Why do they oppose that ? They should of complied with the result since it was a fair ‘democratic’ one, right ? Well, they didn’t. They wanted to keep their power !
Remember when Anakin Skywalker said: “The Sith rely on their passion for their strength. They think inward, only about themselves.” Chancellor Palpatine replied: “And the Jedi don’t ?”
Mace Windu used the same argument to assassinate the Chancellor as the Chancellor used for making Anakin kill Count Doku: ‘he is too dangerous to be left alive’. So you see, the Jedi Masters can be as dark as any.
Mace Windu: I’m going to put an end to this, once and for all!
Anakin Skywalker: You can’t. He must stand trial.
Mace Windu: He has control of the senate and all the courts. He is too dangerous to be left alive!
So due process is for meatbags, not for born with high enough midi-chlorian counts. Just like today’s politicians getting less jail time for stealing millions than beggars stealing food.

     Despite the fact that the Sith were not inherently evil, there’s no question the Jedi saw them as their enemy (even if they’d helped make them). So when Supreme Chancellor Palpatine was revealed to be Darth Sidious, believing in the quest for mastery over life that the Jedi so vehemently disagreed with, what would any ‘peace’-loving religious order do ? In short, attempt to arrest or eliminate him. The problem here is that Chancellor Palpatine was, without question, the ‘democratically’-elected leader of the Galactic Republic. The Jedi had the right to be angry that he had kept his beliefs and religion a secret, and suspicious of what he had planned for the Republic, but remember that bit in their Jedi statements that said they served the Republic’s government, and that they were not in charge of determining who was fit to lead and who was not ? Should not they respect the authority of an elected leader ?

     Any way you look at this, the Jedi attempted a direct military coup that had the objective to get rid of the elected leader of a ‘democracy’, based on their personal vendetta. While they had many diplomatic solutions to bring his Sith origins to the attention of the Republic they instead decided to act without consent. The result: the Jedi were judged by the Republic’s leader to once again threaten freedom and exert control over the Senate, and had to be eliminated (well, call it revenge of the Force for their genocide against the Sith). One could argue that Palpatine had manipulated ‘democracy’ to accomplish his objectives, but that means that he knew the Jedi would not hesitate to remove the head of the Senate by force.

     The conclusion here: storming into an elected Head of State’s office with lightsabers drawn after discovering his philosophical background is practically unacceptable for a ‘peaceful’ organization (which clearly the Jedi are not).

     Is Genocide in the name of ‘peace’ – the practical Jedi way ? Yes.
After the First Great Schism came to an end, and the last twelve ‘Dark Jedi’ surrendered, The Jedi boarded them onto unarmed transport ships, and sent them into Unknown Space. That’s like sending a prisoner into the Sahara desert.
At the conclusion of the Great Hyperspace War the Republic and Jedi were victorious but clearly, their actions 1,900 years earlier failed: the Dark Jedi had survived, and now ruled over a previously-unknown race of humanoids powerful in the Force.
Republic Chancellor Pultimo looked upon an enemy that no longer posed a threat, and ordered the Jedi and Republic forces to invade Sith Space and destroy any remains of the empire and its citizens. Jedi and Republic forces were sent to Korriban and other Sith planets to ensure no remnants of the Sith Empire remained. This purge, known as the Sith Holocaust, ultimately failed, the survivors managing to settle on Dromund Kaas. From here they would rebuild their empire.

     Contrary to the propaganda, whatever extremes each side pushed the other toward, it should be known that at no point did the Sith roamed around and decided to crush all life in the galaxy. They were conquerors in search of mastery over life itself, not genocidal maniacs. They wanted to bring order through power. They even developed their own Sith Code, opposing that preached by Jedi. Rather than speaking of existence as it should be, they focused on the way it was. Practical vs. theoretical approach.

     There are numerous examples of Jedi Genocide. Did you even wondered why General Grievous hates the Jedi so much ?
Well, it’s because they are the cause of his suffering. General Grievous was a Kalish respectable warrior that was named Qymaen jai Sheelal. On the planet Kalee, the inhabitants called Kalish. The technologically-superior Yam’rii of the planet Huk were an insectoid race that attached and destroyed multiple neighboring planets in a conflict that lasted generations. After the Yam’rii overran neighboring planets (such as Abbaji and Tovarskl), ruthlessly colonizing them and plundering their wealth. The insatiable Yam’rii eventually attacked nearby Kalee, seeking to enslave the native Kaleesh. They captured millions of Kaleesh and sold them into slavery. Kaleesh rebelled and the two races waged continuous war. Two powerful Kaleesh warriors rised to fight the invaders: Qymaen jai Sheelal and Ronderu lij Kummar. The two fought courageously together, butchering thousands of Yam’rii insectoids in countless campaigns, their reputations raising to the level of demigods. Ronderu lij Kummar eventually fell in battle against the Yam’rii on the beaches of Kalee, and a distraught Sheelal soon came to adopt the name “Grievous,” surrounding himself with a legion of equally tortured handpicked “elite,” known as the Izvoshra Grievous and his elite warriors finally managed to drive the Yam’rii from Kalee. Then, Grevious and his army started liberating other worlds invaded and colonized by the Yam’rii, finally getting to Tovarskl, at which point the Yam’rii, using their connections with the Trade Federation, desperately petitioned the Republic for help. The senate believed the lie that the Kaleesh started the conflict and ruled on behalf of the Yam’rii. They never bothered to check for the actual evidence and history of the conflict. They instead, dispatched a Jedi task force led by Masters T’chooka D’oon and Jmmaar to stop the war. The Jedi blindly follower the orders and never bothered to check who is actually the aggressor in the Huk wars. The Jedi-lead oppressor forces attached the Kalish without remorse and defeated them. The Republic leveled harsh sanctions and reparations against the Kaleesh for their aggression, and Kalee descended into economic devastation. Grievous watched helplessly as his wives, offspring and fellow people starved, suffered and slowly died, his hatred for the Republic growing. Having no other choices, Grievous became an enforcer for the Inter-Galactic Banking Clan, which promised to help alleviate Kalee’s plight in turn for his services. When Grievous learned that the Yam’rii went unpunished by the Republic while they desecrated Kaleesh burial grounds established on the colony worlds, Grievous broke his commitment to the IBC, and he and his Kaleesh elite boarded a troop shuttle, preparing to re-initiate the Huk War. But when his shuttle was destroyed by an ion bomb. Then Grievous had to be reconstructed as a cyborg, the only way it could survive. During the Clone Wars when Grievous returned to Tovarskl with his droid armies, and destroyed the Yam’rii occupying it, finishing what he had started years earlier. But his hate for the Republic remained.

     The Code reads:
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken. The Force shall free me.
This is what I was saying above. Peace is hands down a lie (today’s over-oppressed over-enslaved world as proof). The rest is a path to development that culminates with FREEDOM, not destruction or anything of that sort; nothing evil about it. And this is a very fair code, because in an oppressive world, the only way for you to be free, to still have a choice, is to have enough power. Without that, you are just a slave.
And since we talked about the code, lets continue on that a little by a complete analysis of the Jedi Code.

     The Jedi Code states:
There is no emotion, there is peace. There is no ignorance, there is knowledge. There is no passion, there is serenity. There is no chaos, only harmony. There is no death, there is the force.

     Now, let us focus on the Jedi code. ‘There is no emotion, there is peace‘. We have proven above that peace is indeed a lie and just a word to justify anything. Did you even wonder why they are denied emotion ? Well, perhaps it’s because it would interfere with the brainwashing ? Apparently, this is a very ‘Vulcan’-like way of thinking in the sense that they go for what is logical as opposed to what their emotions tell them. But only apparently. It’s not pure logic, it’s indoctrination.
Here is why it is not a matter of logic vs. emotion: Logic dictates that if you use your emotions you could actually make choices that are not ‘as ordered’, but actually good, bad, variable, alternate in various situations. You have another way of seeing and determining the parameters of a situation. Denying that leaves you with the doctrine, therefore you will act ‘by default’ as you were taught, programmed. You would be limited in choice and therefore in results.
I wonder what Spock to say about that would have…

     The Jedi only seem to follow the idea of ‘The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few’ and that causes much inner conflict, which can cause emotions, which they want to deny, which cause more inner conflict, more unbalance…well you get it, right ?
They may have to sacrifice someone they care about deeply to save a big group of strangers. But this is another debateble thing. Where do you draw the line ? How many does it take to justify murdering a few to save many ? Well, this is a dark side choice either way. Just like today’s western ‘democracy’ where you keep choosing between 2 evils. There’s always a 3rd choice. Remember that if you will even encounter such a choice.
So, as a Jedi individual, one may have incredible struggle with this choice and may suffer incredible guilt (which leads to unbalance), but as an Order, the Jedi are forced to keep a fake public image and in turn, detach themselves emotionally from the galaxy they are saying they serve (when convenient) and protect (with genocide).

     But are really Jedi not self-centered ? No. And the are terrible comrades in arms too.
Luke first jeopardized the operational security of the rebel raiding party on Endor, giving himself up and risking the entire mission and the lives of many plus the actual freedom of the galaxy…so he could pursue ‘Jedi business’. He eventually found himself locked in a completely strategically irrelevant battle within the Emperor’s throne room aboard the second Death Star. Whether he won or lost had no strategic significance to the war itself. There was a main fleet action underway, on which depended the fate of every sentient being across a hundred million systems. He preferred choosing his personal objective instead of the collective one. But no worries, so did Kenobi and many others before him.

     While that, you know what never happens in the first movies ? A vote to authorize the Clone Wars. Yoda just shows up with an army, and starts a war that ravages uncounted worlds. The Jedi Council thinks nothing about beginning a war, and once it’s begun they take complete authority for leading it. In Episode 3 we find out they oversee the disposition of all forces, not just their own members. They make all strategic decisions, where the troops should go and wage wars, without even consulting the official representatives of those worlds. You know which other military operation was carried out in the same manner ? Order 66. You know what the United States does now in multiple independent countries ? The same.
In other words, the Republic goes through the process of democracy, but at the end of the day, it’s just a Banana Republic ruled by an a fanatic religious oligarchy. Sounds familiar ?

     But why the war ?
The Jedi aren’t fighting a war against an invading force, or against oppressors or some army willing to exterminate them. There is no external threat to ‘peace’ or ‘democracy’. They’re fighting to prevent people from ruling themselves free of the Jedi Council and the oppressive corrupted Republic leadership. They could end the war simply by allowing systems to be free of their control. No war. Just some voting and signatures. Never gonna happen. The Republic practically fails to serve and protect its citizens, and yet they would rather slaughter those same citizens than allow them to pursue their own destiny. What superpower now-days does that ? Well, I mentioned them already.
The Sith are the only ones strong enough to oppose them; only they have the powers required to stand against the Jedi oppressors. Doesn’t opposing tyranny make you the ‘good’ side ? Well, it kinda does. Oh…well…what a surprise: the Sith are not the bad guys, the Jedi are !

     The second line of code ‘There is no ignorance, there is knowledge‘ is a fairly good thing in principle. With this one I agree, since ignorance is the worst thing you can do to yourself or others. But it does not apply practically in the Jedi order. The actual opposite is applied. And you see, knowledge also means power. What do they do with that power ? Not so many good things it seems. They are in fear of losing it, just like Darth Plagueis the Wise was.

     It is clear that both sides (Jedi and Sith) seek knowledge. The problem is the Jedi are trying to deny that knowledge to everyone else while keeping it for themselves (while good old Dark Side Rakata used knowledge to evolve their society as a whole). They limit their followers a lot when it comes to both practical learning and the history or the Order. They restrict information that is considered ‘dangerous’. the problem is that in most cases, it is simple knowledge that may cause someone to see outside the inner indoctrination. So they lie, hide information and are in denial/ignorant of the truth too. Remember Jocasta Nu stating; ‘If an item does not appear in our records, it does not exist’ ? Well, that’s a lie, it’s denial and/or ignorance. They hid the records to their own kind, the most important information being accessible allowed to only the most important of the Masters. Some logic here again: isn’t that completely restrict the information to people among your own ranks possibly more dangerous than having the information available to be studied and countermeasures developed ? Well, it is. Instead of studying the enemy to learn how to protect against them, that part is hidden. When encountering dark side ‘corruption’ it is more likely to be influenced by it if you are unprepared compared to the situation where you studied that and are familiar with their tactics and approach. Elementary, dear Jedi. So statement of ‘There is no ignorance, there is knowledge’ is a complete lie, since they ignore studying the dark side and hide/restrict knowledge as they see fit. Practically, their way is the exact opposite: ‘There is no knowledge, there is ignorance’.
More than that, a lot of their practical knowledge is stolen from others (and then officially classified so others do not also get it). Remember that the galaxy was largely ruled by the Rakata for 10,000 years – The Infinite Empire ? Like many others, the Infinite Empire was built on cutting-edge technology and it was all based on the Dark Side ideology: peace and order can only come through power. (Pace Through Power – Kane).
The Rakata called their weapons ‘Forcesabers,’ using the Force to channel dark energy into a solid blade. Force Hounds were the ones able to construct these weapons, which required the use of a special form of crystal along with the use of alchemy to shape it. The process involved the construction of a hilt and the presence of other adequate resources for the task. The Jedi, thousands of years later, saw the potential made possible through ‘ways of the Dark Side,’ and adapted it for their own use. They therefore created the ‘lightsaber’. So they are not the inventors here, they are the tech thieves. A lot more later used and appropriated by the republic tech came from the Rakata.

     While the Jedi consider themselves good in theory, they are pretty much wrong about most of the practical things:
In the very beginning of ‘The Phantom Menace’, Qui-Gon Jin warns the Jedi Council of Darth Maul.
Qui-Gon Jinn: He had all the lightsaber fighting capabilities and the moves of the Jedi, only faster and more aggressive. My only conclusion… is that it was a Sith Lord.
Ki-Adi-Mundi: Impossible! The Sith are extinct! They have been for nearly a millennium.
Mace Windu: I agree. The Sith would not have returned without us sensing it.
Yoda: Hard to see, the dark side is. We must investigate further before drawing a conclusion to the identity of your adversary.

Emperor Master Comrade Lord Overmind of Borg: Master Yoda, I find your lack of knowledge disturbing…and your ignorance most annoying.

     Ignorance is again proved hands down in the blockade situation:
The peaceful Republic that preceded the Clone Wars had, under the care-taking of the Jedi, achieved unprecedented levels of bureaucracy and corruption to the point where an independent entity could illegally blockade a world and the Republic did not act to stop it. All they did was to sent some Jedi to negotiate for a blockade release ! Why didn’t the Republic fleet unleash unmitigated action against such an act with is in direct violation of any decency principle ?
The Jedi were at the very least complicit if not out-right responsible for the Republic reaching this situation. Is that not itself evil, even if it’s a mild, passive form of it ? Yeap, it’s ignorance at least. They allowed corruption to flourish and then sustained it. Objectively, they are guilty of high treason against the Republic.

     Another example of ignorance, lack of knowledge and stupidity is when the Jedi Council decides to assign Anakin to attend Palpatine, even though they acknowledge, ‘It’s very dangerous, putting them together’. The two most dangerous Force users in the galaxy put together. What could go wrong ? As Captain Picard would say: ‘Not good enough, damn it, not good enough !’

This brigs us inevitable to the deception part we should to talk about a lot because it’s something happening world-wide now: the action if the exact opposite of the statement. (i.e. Pace is war.) But it is not the subject of this article.

     ‘There is no passion, there is serenity‘ is a pretty complex matter to study. First of all, what does passion got to do with serenity ? Well, nothing. Doesn’t the lack of passion lead to ignorance ? I think it does. While we can pick now on the exact definition of passion, it is clear that without it you have little to no interest in a subject, therefore you are very likely to ignore it.
Jedi seem to consider passion something chaotic instead of what it really is: something that gives you motivation, which is a positive constructive thing. So they view passion as dangerous. Again we can find various contradictions here. Take Anakin as example: passion was one of the main contributors that would lead Anakin to become a Jedi in the first place (just like it happened to many other Jedi), but then he talks about it as being a bad thing: ‘The Sith rely on their passion for their strength. They think inwards, only about themselves’.
And after all, isn’t the passion of the Jedi for being Jedi what’s motivating Apprentices to become Knights and then Knights to become Masters in the Order ?
Every single Jedi demonstrates a depth of feeling about something at some point. Consider Obi-Wan’s anguished cries after he mutilated Anakin, just as one well known basic example.

     Serenity problems: Aren’t the Jedi supposed to see the worth in all living things ?
Why then does (in Phantom Menace) Obi-Wan refers to Jar-Jar Binks as a ‘pathetic life form’ ?
Fact is, the Jedi place no value on non-Jedi lives whatsoever. The Jedi systematically prove they really couldn’t care less who they endanger or kill. Just watch the number of actions the Jedi take that might or actually will result in the deaths of non combatants or involve them killing someone in ‘self-defense’ who poses no actual credible threat to them. This is constantly proven by their action starting with endangering civilian lives and ending with the more genocidal actions.
     Now take a look at this even by them detected Jedi arrogance:
Obi-Wan: But he still has much to learn, Master. His abilities have made him… well, arrogant.
Yoda: Yes. Yes. A flaw more and more common among Jedi. Too sure of themselves they are. Even the older, more experienced ones.
Where’s the Serenity ? Seems to be missing. But there’s plenty of arrogance in the Jedi Order, that’s for sure.

     If you play Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic you will find several references of Jedi that use deception, that cheat and lie, that have no regard for human life (one even had a Soylent-Green-Type plant to make weapons of of dead body substances on Taris) or that pursue their own purposes.
There are also dozens of references of brainwashing and propaganda used on them by the Council Masters, the higher ranks. If you play light side as a Sith Warrior when you encounted them, they will be very amazed that you are not ‘pure evil’ as they were lead / programmed to believe. Many will be left very unbalanced because they are unable to process that you are not actually evil. In their brainwashed minds, The Sith and The Empire equal evil, so doing a good did in front of them will actually cause a lockdown in their brain and they will answer with something like ‘you gave me a lot to keep thinking about’.
This happens today just the same (i.e. Propaganda Machine states things like: The Russians are evil, the Chinese are evil, the Terrorists will attack you, the Aliens, etc … and while that propaganda is mostly working, the real evil is your own government that is oppressing you and turning you into an obedient meatbag slave).
Error 404: serenity not found.

     ‘There is no chaos, there is harmony‘ – Since Jedi suppose to not to be self-centric, this can refer to preventing chaos throughout the galaxy by keep the peace using harmony (macroscopic level). But the Jedi Generals leading armies kindof cause some Chaos and disharmony, don’t they ? And plenty of it !
The code part can also be related to the inner things (microscopic level). But then, if it’s a matter of inner self, isn’t that kind of selfish and comes in conflict with ‘The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few’ and theoretically selflessness ideology ?
It seems more like ‘The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few except for the Jedi’ would be more fit for their case.

Of course in theory by having understanding and using meditation, they are able to find inner peace, but practically you cannot have light without dark, you cannot have peace without conflict. And their internal conflict is great. They are in a continuous internal conflict, compared to the Sith that have a clear general objective.

     So in the case of the Jedi, we have their internal conflict (trying to maintain their inner stability, serenity, etc) , their ideological conflict (that comes from the conflicting Jedi Code and forbidden knowledge) and their external conflict (they lead wars in the name of peace). Where is the peace in there ? They are in a triple continuous conflict. Definitely total chaos and no harmony.

     Here is a good example of provoked Chaos is the Clone Wars:
The Clone Wars all started with the passing of a Financial Reform Bill. Well, attempted passing. You see, here’s the trick in the moveis: giving the impressions that the Separatists were simply ‘bad guys’. The truth is way different: the commercially powerful systems of the galaxy wanted to control everything in the senate to keep their ‘capitalistic’ growth. The taxation and corruption of the Senate from top to bottom did not make the larger corporations revolt, but that was because they wanted to introduce a new financial reform to protect their exact interests. Before a vote could take place, the Senator representing the Commonality of trade planets was assassinated by a bribed Senate guard and the vote was canceled. This is something quite similar to todays corporations: big ones bribe politicians to make favorable laws for them while smaller ones are stripped of all chances to evolve.
Given that corruption, The Commonality broke off from the corrupt body and formed the Confederacy of Independent Systems.
While in the movies they were presented as a set of ‘bad’ characters, the Separatist Confederacy was made up of over 8 galactic governments, dozens of Republic Senators and spanned over 10,000 star systems.
The Jedi and Republic didn’t even formally recognize the group’s existence, choosing instead to defend the corrupt government and rather than address the Separatist concerns, simply wipe them out – another Genocide. MDK !
So the ‘guardians of peace’ went to full scale war and supported genocide instead of freedom. Guardians of corruption is more close to a valid naming for that era’s Jedi.

So far we have proven that there is no peace, their knowledge is restricted, they are ignorant and often get emotional, their serenity is near impossible to obtain just as their harmony and they are surrounded and live in both internal and external chaos.
So the Code should state so far: There is no peace, there is emotion. There is no knowledge, there is ignorance. There is no serenity, there is passion. There is no harmony, only chaos.

Even Yoda admits their system is not working: ‘Blind we are, of creation of this clone army we could not see.’ Ignorant Master Yoda was. This reminds me of the SWTOR intro when the Sith return. Same Jedi ignorance there too. While the Sith prepared 300 years, the Jedi stayed cock-in-hand enjoying their status under the corrupted Republic.

     Note also that Chaos is also unrelated to good or evil. You can be chaotic good or chaotic evil. See the alignment schematic from Neverwinter Nights to understand how alignments work.

     ‘There is no death, there is only the force‘ – this is a part that is present in every religion, the Jedi believe in an afterlife and becoming one with the Force after death. You don’t die, you go to ‘somewhere else’ where it’s better. Seems fine ? It’s actually not. It is the main part of the deception ! Think like this: you are constantly being told when bad things happen that ‘tomorrow’ will be better, that bad thins will go away, etc. Tomorrow is even worse, you do nothing again hoping for the new tomorrow and you eventually die. This culminates with ‘do not worry if you suffered all your life, you will die, go to heaven and be rewarded’.

Well, it’s just a DECEPTION. It will not happen. What kind of God would appreciate someone for being a kiss-ass slave all its life and lacking the balls to stand up to anything ? Think about that while you are being deceived next time. The deception is present in all religions because since they fail to practically help you, they will at least promise you something that you cannot validate if true.

Now if we look again at the Sith code, we will notice that unlike the Jedi code (where each statement is mostly separate, not directly related to the ones before it and each time in conflict with anything practical and/or with previous statements), the Sith code is something that builds on itself and evolves, much like the Sith following it.

Practically, the entire code could be taken as a personal mantra that any regular person could use in their every day life to gain general success. The views and teachings of the Sith Order more simple to grasp, and are well accepted and practiced within today’s society.

     The Sith seem more in depth into growth and bettering themselves not only as an Order, but as individuals. Power socially and personally – is the ability to effect change, to disrupt the status quo, to see a wrong and decide to make things better. Without power, nothing happens. Without power, you are just a slave. Amassing personal power and/or gathering the collective power of a group is the only way to can do this. We’ve seen this throughout history, time and again. That’s why most are practically slaves today, due to the lack of power. 1% are in power, 4% are the buffer zone and 95% are the slaves. The only bad thing about them is actually the rule of 2, a thing that imposes a limitation which in turn is not compliant with the original Sith code. More apprentices, more power ! No rule of 2, thank you.

The Sith have little to hide, and will therefore have no problems being open with the truth. They may only tell half the truth and not the entire story, but very rarely do they actually lie and twist their words around. They mostly declare their objectives and intentions in plain sight, even if they are inconvenient to be heard. But to see something, even in plain sight, you must first open your eyes. You should make a general check on the 6 SW episodes and you will conclude that the Jedi lie way too often.

     Here’s another very important aspect worth mentioning: many extremely powerful Jedi Masters turned to the Dark Side, which proves multiple things like that the Light side is insufficient for them, that the teachings of the Jedi are flawed to allow such ‘corruption’.
Note that most of those are among the most powerful Force useres ever !

Kreia – Initially a well respected and powerful Jedi Historian in the time of the Mandalorian Wars fell into disfavor as her apprentice Revan, and her teachings were used as justification for defying the will of the Council to combat the Mandalorians. She was banished from the Order as a result but did not stop, eventually becaming Darth Traya. Her skills with a lightsaber were profound for someone so devoted to Force lore itself, able to telekinetically wield three blades at once while also mastering several forms of combat with her own fourth personal blade. She also possessed the ability to ‘see’ with the Force, like the Miralukas. Her perceptive abilities were so advanced that she could forsee events with great clarity even thousands of years after her time, even ones such as Jango Fett’s death. Her general influence has shaped the galactic history for millennia to come.

Revan – The greatest Jedi Master and he became the most powerful Dark Lord of the Sith of his day. He broke off from the Order when he felt they were too complacent in handling the Mandalorian Wars situation. He was also the first to break from the Emperors’ mind control and become a Sith Lord all his own, rather than a pawn of the Emperor. As Dark Lord of the Sith, Revan and his apprentice Malak rebuilt the Sith Empire into a force to be reckoned with once again.

Darth Desolous (cca 3522 BBY) – was a male Pau’an Jedi Master prior to becoming a Sith Lord. After he studied Sith teachings and was expelled from the Jedi Order, he became Lord of the Sith.

Darth Ruin – Born as Phanius was an Umbaran Jedi Master who left the Jedi Order and then became a Dark Lord of the Sith who lived over two millennia before the Battle of Yavin. Seeing the flaws in the Jedi Code, he created his own Force code to live by called ‘the creed of Ruin’: “There is no passion. There is solely obsession.; There is no knowledge. There is solely conviction.; There is no purpose. There is solely will.; There is nothing. Only me.”

Ajunta Pall – A Jedi Master at the time of the First Great Schism, Ajunta Pall would become the forebear to much of the darkness in the galaxy as the first Dark Lord of the Sith ever. Pall was disgusted by what he felt was arrogance on the Order’s part and with his followers, declared war on the Jedi which led to the Hundred Year Darkness when Jedi fought Dark Jedi in a bloody civil war. After being eventually defeated he settled on Korriban where he discovered a race of relatively primitive Force-sensitives known as the Sith.

Freedon Nadd – Once a gifted Jedi in the earlier days of the Order, Nadd would go on to become one of the most powerful and influential Dark Lords of the Sith in his or any time. Naturally gifted with the Force, able to master techniques that only advanced Jedi Masters themselves possessed, before he began his actual Jedi training. Due to the thirst for more knowledge, he eventually killed his master and became the apprentice of Naga Sadow.

Ulic Qel-Droma – One of the most complex beings in Galactic history, Ulic was a renowned Jedi Knight in his time and eventually Sith apprentice to Exar Kun with whom he raged war on the Republic.

Darth Kray – initially A’Sharad Hett, he rose to prominence during the Clone Wars, attaining the rank of Knight and then Master, befriending and accompanying Anakin and Obi-Wan on several missions. After surviving Order 66 He returned to his homeworld of Tatooine and became leader of the Tusken Raiders. He would later become a bounty hunter ending up on Korriban where he secretly reconstituted the Sith Empire, abolishing the Rule of Two in favor of a Rule of One (that one being the Empire itself). Eventually he would reveal himself to Luke Skywalker when the two, Jedi and Sith combined, combated and finally defeated the monster Abeloth. Krayt was a Jar’Kai specialist throughout his life, able to wield two blades at a time and it was this skill that made him a legend over several eras of combat. His mastery of the Force was immense, such that its darkness could be felt by every Sith in the galaxy when he applied his will. His Force lightning could obliterate stone columns but destruction was not his greatest ability. His Force healing was incredible, suffering years of torture and wounds over many decades he was able to heal himself each and every time to emerge stronger still. After years of self stasis, Krayt would emerge to lead the Sith against the Republic once more some 130 years after the Battle of Yavin when Luke was no longer alive. He brought the Republic and the Order to its knees once more, destroying their long held peace and ruling the galaxy for the better part of a decade to come.

Karness Muur – Maybe less known, he was one of the earliest and strongest Lords of the Sith, Karness fell to the Dark Side and was banished by the Order along with the original Dark Jedi that would go on to become the Sith Empire as we know it. As the Great Schism tore the Order apart, the Dark Jedi were exiled and fled to Korriban, homeworld of the Sith (which it should be noted, most people don’t quite know the Sith were actually a species that the Dark Jedi ended up enslaving and mating with, thus essentially assimilating them and becoming known thenceforth themselves over time as ‘Sith’.) After the subjugation of the Sith, Muur delved much further into his sorcery and alchemy, revolutionizing both areas in the Dark Side for millennia to come. His skills were almost unparalleled, advancing Sith power to new heights as he created ‘Sithspawn’, creatures of immense twisted power like Leviathans and Rakghouls (non force-sensitive beings transformed into monsters).

Darth Malak – Dark Lord of the Sith after Revan’s redemption, Malak was also at one point a Jedi Knight along side his onetime best friend and eventually Sith Master when he followed Revan to the Dark Side at the end of the Mandalorian Wars.

Count Dooku – One of the Jedi Order’s most respected and venerable Masters at one time, Dooku would eventually become the spearhead for the Seperatist movement that helped lead to the start of the infamous Clone Wars. You well know what happened to him.

Skere Kaan – A male Human Jedi Master who served the Jedi Order in the last years of the New Sith Wars before defecting to become a Dark Lord of the Sith and creating the Brotherhood of Darkness within the reorganized Sith Empire, earning him the nickname of the “Dark One”.

The fact that they turn to the Dark side also shows that being a Jedi is just part of a Force Masters’s development, the half I talked about in the begining of the article.

     Given all the above, I find it weird how the Jedi are still considered to be the ‘good guys’, and the Sith are considered the ‘bad guys’.

     From an evolutionary perspective, there’s nothing innate to the Sith or their Code that makes them evil. Indeed, the values they hold are all about self-empowerment to bring about change and throw off oppression in all its forms (which is not evil either). The Jedi, by contrast, are about stagnancy, dependency and suppression of the self. Who will evolve more eventually ? Not the Jedi !

     In today’s society a very interesting thing occurs: while western leaders declare constantly their ‘good intentions’ but bomb the hell out of any opposition and use false-flag to gain more power, the rest of the world are considered the ‘bad guys’ just because they want to keep their freedom intact and not comply into slavery.
Does that make simple humanity and society ‘bad’ or ‘evil’ ? No… it’s the oppressors that make genocide in the name of ‘peace’ that are closest to ‘bad’ and ‘evil, not the ones that oppose it.

     So next time when you view the Jedi as the ‘good guys’ or the Sith as the ‘bad guys’, think about it a little more.
And don’t think of ‘a galaxy far, far away’, think for the country you currently live in and the leaders you have. And also you may sk yourself if some characters in the world’s religion may have been in the same situation, assuming they were not 100% fictional.

     The Force itself does not have a dark or light side alignment. It is one. It exists in perfect balance. The whole Universe is designed to be a duality. How it works is explained in the Clone Wars animated series. The Ones were a family of exceptionally powerful Force wielders. Led by the Father, the Son and Daughter were embodiments of the Dark and Light sides of the Force, respectively. Watch the episodes related to this as they are more interesting even than the recent SW Ep7 movie.
     Remember, it is your actions that determine your alignment, not the Force itself. But be aware that your actions may have unforeseen consequences. The Force is with you, but do you have enough willpower and inner strength to actually use it ?

Posted in Mind Wars, The Force | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The most secure browser in the world is and always was Opera – [En]

        I have seen a lot of debates on various tech forums about which browser is the safest one (or the fastest one). While speed is a very debatable thing, when it comes to security things are pretty precise. Being tired of arguing with various cows or oxes I did a little digging and I found the browser security statistics from CISCO, the largest network equipment manufacturer and provider in the world.

        This is the up to current date stat with browser vulnerability:


        You can check that out directly on the CISCO website if you visit this after a few years and need a more updated version. As you can see, Opera IS the safest browser since ever and probably will continue to be. Now you barking doggies that are over-fanatic about failfox and chrome take a deep breath and just think about another fact: Opera invented pretty much everything the rest of the browsers just copy-pasted, starting with tabs, going through dozens of things it would be futile to mention and ending up with the Speed Dial latest big thing that the rest just renamed and copied.
        The course rests. The case is closed.

Posted in Research and Dismemberment | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How to identify 18650 cell capacity by color / code and how to tell fakes from real – [En]

        Before anything, I’ll briefly explain what 18650 cells are and what uses they may have. I have worked a lot with 18650 cells and I used them for pretty much anything that needs power.
        Basically, they are Li-Ion cells, that means they have the same overall parameters as a now-days phone battery. Their nominal voltage is 3.7V or 3.6V, but this is not too relevant. What’s important to note is that they are fully charged at 4.2V and they are considered discharged at 3.3V. Overcharging or excessively discharging them will shorten their lifetime.
        The cells can be used for quite a lot of applications: flashlights, lasers, measurement tools, even power tools (but in this case some special ones are used that can provide higher current and have lower capacity – I will not discuss the tech details here). Practically, anything that used to be able to work with 3 AA/R6 or AAA/R3 batteries can be safely used with an 18650 cell. If the space conditions are met, it’s really good to have only one standard type of cell for anything. It’s very useful instead of having various sizes of rechargeable batteries.
        Now, to get to the point of the article: there are many dozens of types of 18650 cells that can be found in shops, on-line sites or laptop batteries. I will try to explain here how to find the correct capacity for the biggest 18650 cell manufacturers around. Note that ripping old laptop batteries is a good near-free way to acquire cells. Usually, you will find a dead pair, a good pair and 1-2 intermediary ones (assuming there are 3/4 pairs in the battery). Most of the time the cells that have 2V+ when ripped out can recover most of their capacity when charged, while the ones under 1V are no longer usable and will overheat if you try to charge them.
        There are 4 very big companies that produce (used to be) very good quality cells: Samsung, Sanyo, Sony and LG. And there’s also the 99.998% fakes called Ultrafire. Practically, all Ultrafire cells on the online market that state any capacity over 3000mAh are fakes. Since there are other fake cells with fake-stated capacity, I’ll tell you how to detect them too. Fist of all, they have stated capacities of over 4000mAh, which is not currently possible. The best confirmed capacity original cell at this point has 3400mAh. Second, their weight is lighter. Original cells are 45grams+. Fakes have mostly under 40g, and the worst quality ones are even 20g. Those have an effective capacity of under 500mAh, even if they state 4000mAh+ on the label.
        Now, for each of the 4 big companies I’ll tell you how to see what actual capacity a cell is. I’ll also post RGB values, since the pictures may not look 100% like the original.

        Most Samsung cells in circulation are kind of Cyan color (RGB: 80,255,255). Note that other smaller companies use this color, but only the Samsungs have Samsung written on them.
Here is the color I’m talking about – in this picture we have a 2000mAh cell. Same color can be found for 2200mAh (most common) and 2400mAh.
The 2000mAh ones can also be light blue (RGB: 40,200,255).
Light green (RGB: 15,240,115) is used by Samsung for 2200mAh and 2400mAh cells:
The majority of the 2200mAh cells are Cyan, like the pic with the 2000 ones. The green version is the newer 2200 model.
Most 2400 mAh cells are DarkSkyblue (RGB: 0,120,240):
The 2600 mAh cells from Samsung come in only one color so far – Ugly Pink (RGB: 255,128,255):
Note that it’s more pink/ugly when seen live.
Samsung also has 3000mAh cells on the market, which are not that ugly as the pink ones (RGB: 100,133,200):
Since for 2000,2200 and 2400 mAh cell things can get confusing when it comes to colors, the best way to identify capacity is from the end of the line number in the first text line on the cell (the row where it says 18650). As you can see in the pictures, that’s exactly what 20,22,24,26 and 30 mean – it’s the capacity tag for any Samsung cells. So there you have it, you can now identify any Samsung cell.

Most Sanyo cells are RED (RGB: 255,0,0), or the new fakeRED (RGB: 255,0,64) that’s infested with blue (we’ll talk about that later). They are the most hard to identify overall.

This is how a real red cell suppose to look like (RGB: 255,0,0):
The 2000mAh original ones are indeed red by any standards. The cap is white. So if it’s pure red ones it’s 2000mAh capacity. The newer ones were also fakered (RGB: 255,0,64), but the cap is still white.
Here they are:

The 2200mAh cells and above are fakered (RGB: 255,0,64). It’s hard to detect in a picture, but there’s a clear tendency towards purple for those.
You can tell the cells that have 2200mAh capacity be the RED cap. Yes, the cap is true red, unlike the rest of the cell.
The 2600mAh ones are also fakered (RGB: 255,0,64), but those have cyan cap. Don’t get tricked by the red in the picture, it’s a lot more towards purple in practice:

The new 2800 and 3100 capacity models are orange and purple, but I haven’t seen any yet, so I won’t post them yet.

The high power cells (like the high current 1500mAh ones used in power tools) have a pink or light blue cap.
So, to identify the Sanyo cell, you’ll have to use actual color nuance and cap color, since the series written on them are most of the time barely visible.
Still, I’ll list the known series so you know what’s what if you can actually read it from the cell:

UR18650EA 2350mAh High Drain
UR18650RX 2050mAh High Drain
UR18650W2 1600mAh High Drain
UR18650WX 1600mAh High Drain
UR18650A 2250mAh Standard
UR18650AA 2250mAh Standard
UR18650ZY 2600mAh Standard
UR18650ZT 2700mAh High Capacity
UR18650ZTA 3000mAh High Capacity

They are part of the above, so I did not consider them a separate company.
Panasonic has 3 common cells in circulation.

The lime-green (RGB: 200,255,127) has 2250mAh:

There is a 2900mAh cell that is ugly grey (RGB: 163,163,163) :

Their newer blue-infested green (RGB: 0,255,127 ) cell has 3100mAh:

Sony are standard green (RGB: 0,183,0). All of them are the same green so we’ll have to identify them differently. The way to identify them is the G-number.
On the second line, the first number after the G is the capacity identifier.
Here’s the 2200mAh cell:
Here we have the 2400mAh cell:
And finally the 2600mAh one:

As you can see, the 2000mAh cell is marked with G5, the 2400 one with G7 and the 2600 one with G8.
That’s how to tell them apart. There’s also another important difference for the 2600mAh cell: it’s case does not cover the bottom at all, unlike the 2200 and 2400 ones there it’s bent and covers about 1mm of the bottom part. I think 2400mAh cells do exist that have no bottom cover also, but are in significantly smaller number.

Last one in the big league is LG. In their case, the series on the cells are a big mess and will never make sense unless you search for them and even then you may not find anything relevant. But the good thing is that they can be identified very easy by color.
The 2000mAh cells are pale orange (RGB: 255,155,112); they can still be found around:

The 2200mAh are grey (RGB: 172,172,183). They are still one of the most common LG cells:

Probably the most used LG cell today is the 2600mAh one which is orange (RGB: 255,155,63):

LG also has some new cells rated at 3100mAh (RGB 147,147,255):
No, they’re not as ugly as the Samsung pink but not very pleasant to look at either.

As you see, the good way to identify LG cells is directly by color.

        So there you have it – each one has a trick: for Samsung you have to check the tag at the end of the line, for Sanyo the cap for Sony the G-spot and for LG just the cell color.

        If you have any unidentified cell, don’t hesitate to post a link with a picture of it and I’m sure we can find what’s with it.

Posted in Research and Dismemberment | 13 Comments